2013-06-26

Voting Rights Act in flux, new analysis needed

The Supreme Court of the United States recently ruled that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 needs updating. The list of states and jurisdictions that were covered by the VRA was deemed old and obsolete. So, now we need new analysis of where voting rights abuses are happening. Where is registration and turnout skewed indicating a systemic problem? Where are districts distorted by the gerrymandering tactics of cracking and packing? The temporary loss of VRA coverage may be a problem, but right now I'd like to be hopeful and optimistic that if we put some new consideration into this problem we can make things even better in the future.

3 comments:

  1. Have you taken a look at old election data? How would previous elections have gone had your maps been in use? And is Nate Silver paying attention?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Supreme Court ruling on the Voting Rights Act, emphasizing the need for updated analysis to address voting rights abuses, skewed registration and turnout, and gerrymandering tactics, while expressing hope for improved solutions in the future. Seeking excel in your MBA journey with our specialized mba essay service. Our expert team delivers tailored essays to meet the rigorous standards of business academia. From strategic analysis to leadership insights, we ensure top-notch quality and timely delivery.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A pivotal point in American history has occurred with the Supreme Court of the United States' recent decision that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 needs to be updated. It draws attention to how voting rights are changing and how crucial it is to guarantee equitable access for everyone. By the way, make sure you acquire the right aid to explain your views clearly and professionally if you're working on a related research paper and need dissertation formatting help uk.

    ReplyDelete